Re: Why do we keep UnusedLock1 in LWLockId?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Heikki Linnakangas
Тема Re: Why do we keep UnusedLock1 in LWLockId?
Дата
Msg-id 49ACE330.9050004@enterprisedb.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Why do we keep UnusedLock1 in LWLockId?  (ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>)
Список pgsql-hackers
ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
> There is UnusedLock1 in LWLockId enumerations in storage/lwlock.h .
> |    UnusedLock1,                /* FreeSpaceMapLock used to be here */
> 
> I thought it is for keeping LWLockId same as 8.3 at first,
> but we've already split SInvalLock to SInvalReadLock and
> SInvalWriteLock. So the IDs are changed anyway.

The idea was indeed to keep the lock numbering unchanged. Zdenek 
suggested that to make dtrace scripts etc. compatible across versions. 
You're right, we split SInvalLock in 8.4, so reserving the slot for 
FreeSpaceLock doesn't keep the numbers unchanged. In fact, removing that 
will make the rest of the lock numbers the same as in 8.3 again.

I'll remove that.

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: KaiGai Kohei
Дата:
Сообщение: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1668)
Следующее
От: Greg Stark
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: statistics horribly broken for row-wise comparison