Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 14:17 +0900, KaiGai Kohei wrote:
>> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 22:56 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Since it's going to take us two weeks to clean up the other loose ends
>>>>> anyway, there's no harm in letting Simon and Heikki try to complete the
>>>>> patch by then. But I'll happily lay a side bet with you about what the
>>>>> situation will be two weeks from now.
>>>> I think Tom wins this bet, since it's now been four weeks. In fact,
>>>> he was being optimistic: the loose ends aren't cleaned up either
>>>> (based on a review of the wiki, we're about half way there: six
>>>> patches have been committed in the intervening time and seven remain
>>>> in the queue).
>>> I agree. It is time to move on.
>> Huh? What features are you saying about to be moved on?
>> Is it the updatable-view feature? or rest of all pending ones?
>
> Tom originally stated (as I recall, no flames please) that we would wait
> for 2 weeks for the hot standby stuff. It has now been four. That is
> what I and I believe Robert Haas are talking about.
Thanks, it helps me clear.
P.S,
I would like folks not to forget SE-PostgreSQL.
--
OSS Platform Development Division, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>