Re: differnce from ansi sql standard - unicode strings?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: differnce from ansi sql standard - unicode strings?
Дата
Msg-id 499AD340.4050502@gmx.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на differnce from ansi sql standard - unicode strings?  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: differnce from ansi sql standard - unicode strings?
Список pgsql-hackers
Pavel Stehule wrote:
> I found BNF for SQL 2003 and I found there some small difference.
> Standard use keyword ESCAPE, but PostgreSQL use keybord UESCAPE.
> 
> Anybody knows reason?
> 
>   <Unicode character string literal>    ::=
>          [ <introducer> <character set specification> ]
>          U <ampersand> <quote> [ <Unicode representation> ... ] <quote>
>          [ { <separator> <quote> [ <Unicode representation> ... ] <quote> }... ]
>          [ ESCAPE <escape character> ]

My copy has

<Unicode character string literal> ::=
[ <introducer><character set specification> ]
U<ampersand><quote> [ <Unicode representation>... ] <quote>
[ { <separator> <quote> [ <Unicode representation>... ] <quote> }... ]
<Unicode escape specifier>

<Unicode escape specifier> ::= [ UESCAPE <quote><Unicode escape 
character><quote> ]


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Gregory Stark
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4660: float functions return -0
Следующее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: differnce from ansi sql standard - unicode strings?