Tom Lane wrote:
> mha@postgresql.org (Magnus Hagander) writes:
>> Explicitly bind gettext to the correct encoding on Windows.
>
> I have a couple of objections to this patch. First, what happens if
> it fails to find a matching table entry? (The existing answer is
> "nothing", but that doesn't seem right.) Second and more critical,
> it adds still another data structure that has to be maintained when
> the list of encodings changes, and it doesn't even live in the same
> file as any existing encoding-information table.
>
> What makes more sense to me is to add a table to encnames.c that
> provides the gettext name of every encoding that we support.
Do you mean a separate table there, or should we add a new column to one
of the existing tables?
//Magnus