Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>> I think what you want here is some way to define a function that takes an
>> arbitrary number of arguments of arbitrary type and let the function figure
>> everything out. I see no reason why this can't be a variant on CREATE
>> FUNCTION, except that of course you need to figure out some API and function
>> resolution details.
>
> We've already got "variadic any" functions --- the problem is to tell
> the parser what the function's result type will be, given a particular
> parameter list. I agree that hooking transformExpr is not exactly the
> most ideal way to attack that from a performance or complexity
> standpoint.
What is the defined return type logic for the decode() function anyway? If you want the full CASE-like resolution
logic,it might be very hard
to fit that into a general system.