Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements

> But the real bottom line is: if autovacuum is working properly, it
> should clean up the index before the list ever gets to the point where
> it'd be sane to turn off indexscans.  So I don't see why we need to hack
> the planner for this at all.  If any hacking is needed, it should be
> in the direction of making sure autovacuum puts sufficient priority
> on this task.

Autovacuum will start if table has GIN index with fastupdate=on and number of 
inserted tuple since last vacuum > autovacuum_vacuum_threshold.
-- 
Teodor Sigaev                                   E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru
  WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/