Re: encoding of PostgreSQL messages
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: encoding of PostgreSQL messages |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 499278D4.7040802@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: encoding of PostgreSQL messages (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: encoding of PostgreSQL messages
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote: > Reflecting on the bigger picture ... I would imagine that the vast > majority of existing applications depend on client_encoding settings > that come from postgresql.conf, ALTER USER SET, ALTER DATABASE SET, or > just the default (== database encoding). I don't think a solution that > penalizes those cases and makes only the case of setting it via > PGCLIENTENCODING work nicely is going to make very many people happy. I don't have any survey data available, but I think this assessment is semantically wrong. Usefully, the client encoding can come only from the client, or be defaulted (and even that is semantically wrong). I see the other cases as workarounds.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: