Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>> Dave Page wrote:
>>> It's possible to set a per-database connection limit of < -1, which seems bogus:
>
>> Yeah. That's simple to fix, but I'm having trouble wordsmithing the
>> error message. This is what I came up with:
>
> Why does it need to be anything except GUC's standard "invalid value"
> message? I really don't believe that this case is worth making
> translators deal with an additional string.
I guess. The message in guc.c seems a bit cumbersome, though, so I did
create a new message for it. It's now simply "invalid connection limit: %d".
The check was missing from per-user connection limits, fixed that too.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com