I just realized that the new minSafeStartPoint is actually exactly the
same concept as the existing minRecoveryPoint. As the recovery
progresses, we could advance minRecoveryPoint just as well as the new
minSafeStartPoint.
Perhaps it's a good idea to keep them separate anyway though, the
original minRecoveryPoint might be a useful debugging aid. Or what do
you think?
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com