Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable
| От | Joshua Brindle |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4981161E.60807@manicmethod.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Then you can write something which goes through and sets all the rows > to false and then visits every row of every table in the database and > forces OID lookups on the security ID of each. When you get done, any > rows that still say false are unreferenced and can be killed. > > Also... even if there are thousands of contexts, it only matters to > the extent that there is a lot of churn, and I'm not sure whether > that's something that is expected. Josh Brindle, any thoughts? > I wouldn't expect a whole lot of churn. Maybe when a project is archived you'd grab everything with a particular security context, save it off and remove it from the table. Constant relabels or removals based on context don't seem too likely though.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: