Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Chernow <ac@esilo.com> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Hmm ... so actually we could get *rid* of that special case if we added
>>> this one. Okay, I withdraw the complaint.
>
>> Done.
>
> Were you hoping this would get back-patched, and if so how far?
>
>
No, we don't need a back-patch. We need way too many features in 8.4
... like the really amazing libpq-events feature :)
--
Andrew Chernow
eSilo, LLC
every bit counts
http://www.esilo.com/