Re: Pluggable Indexes
| От | Teodor Sigaev |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Pluggable Indexes |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4978461F.3030308@sigaev.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Pluggable Indexes (Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Pluggable Indexes
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> What other constraints are there on such non-in-core indexex? Early (2005) > GIST indexes were very painful in production environments because vacuuming > them held locks for a *long* time (IIRC, an hour or so on my database) on > the indexes locking out queries. Was that just a shortcoming of the > implementation, or was it a side-effect of them not supporting recoverability. GiST concurrent algorithm is based on Log Sequence Number of WAL and that was the reason to implement WAL (and recoverability) first in GiST. -- Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: