Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> However, one question: The comment currently says it's harmless to do
>>> this on non-windows platforms. Does this still hold true?
>> Yes, the non-WIN32 code path appears to be the same, still. But the
>> ifdef WIN32 part we don't want, because that presumes something about
>> the spelling of encoding names in the local iconv library.
>>
>>> If we do keep the thing win32 only, I think we should just wrap the
>>> whole thing in #ifdef WIN32 and no longer do the codeset stuff at all on
>>> Unix - that'll make for cleaner code.
>> Yes, that would be much better.
>
> Something like this then?
Looks OK to me.