Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements

> I notice you added a fillfactor reloption in ginoptions, but does it
> really make sense?  I recall removing it because the original code
> contained a comment that says "this is here because default_reloptions
> wants it, but it has no effect".

I didn't change a recognition of fillfactor value, although GIN doesn't use it 
for now.

-- 
Teodor Sigaev                                   E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru
  WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/