Re: 9.0 ?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Josh Berkus
Тема Re: 9.0 ?
Дата
Msg-id 49624A02.1040007@agliodbs.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: 9.0 ?  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
Ответы Re: 9.0 ?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Re: 9.0 ?  (Dawid Kuroczko <qnex42@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-advocacy
> Current policy is that we don't increment the version number for marketing
> purposes, and at this point it's probably premature to have the discussion
> until we get a complete picture of what items not yet committed will actually
> make it in.
>

Also, it's going to be painful for our redistributors when we switch
over to 10.0, so we're setting a really high bar for that first digit.

We took 10 years to go from 6.0 to 8.0.  Linux is still on version 2, as
is Java, and Perl has been version 5 for ~~ 12 years now.  So, no rush.  ;-)

--Josh



В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Users group on a map
Следующее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PGCon 2008 RFP