Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Tino Wildenhain wrote:
>>> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>>> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> And if nothing else, there is *nothing* else that I can think of that
>>>>> meats the low tech standard and can be managed by more than one
>>>>> person.
>>>> I think "more than one person" does not mean "any random guy round the
>>>> corner", it means "somebody else from the team, preferrably people who
>>>> is already is charge of the website".
>>> Now we know some of the goals it would be nice to learn about the people
>>> already in charge, who are they and what do they know about languages
>>> and frameworks? This would make it much more easy to recommend
>>> something. I read that we have freebsd, perl and PHP so far...
>>
>> Oh, if you're into what we *have*, we also have python, django,
>> postgresql (d'uh), mediawiki.. Ehh. I'm sure you can find a lot more.
>
> a _LOT_ more actually :-)
Ah yes, what I wanted is more an overview what technologies are
supportable, not what the zoo already has :-) (Sure one can conclude
that what is there at the moment is at least somewhat supported :-)
Cheers
Tino