Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 00:42 -0500, Emmanuel Cecchet wrote:
>
>> I still don't
>> get why people would use SERIALIZABLE since there is no efficient
>> implementation of it.
>>
>
> If they need true serializable transactions, and don't care about
> efficiency.
>
Is there such people who really understand the thing and don't complain
about the performance? ;-)
Happy holidays,
Emmanuel