Re: dblink vs SQL/MED

Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter wrote:
>> SQL/MED catalog manipulation facilities
>>
>> This doesn't do any remote or external things yet, but it gives modules
>> like plproxy and dblink a standardized and future-proof system for
>> managing their connection information.
> 
> It seems this is a pile of pretty useless code, so far as the core
> distribution is concerned, unless somebody fixes dblink to use it.
> Is that on anyone's radar for 8.4?

How much time is left to get it done? I might be able to find some time 
on the weekend after Christmas, or the weekend after New Years day -- is 
that soon enough?

Joe