Re: DTrace probes patch
| От | Robert Lor |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: DTrace probes patch |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 494957B8.8050009@sun.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: DTrace probes patch (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: DTrace probes patch
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > But there are 5 callers of XLogWrite ... why aren't the other ones being > tracked too? > > This probe originally came from Simon, so it can't possibly be wrong :-) My understanding is that we only want to track the XLogWrite when advancing to the next buffer page, and if there is unwritten data in the new buffer page, that indicates no more empty WAL buffer pages available, but I may be wrong. I did some tests by adjusting wal_buffers, and I could observe this behavior, more calls to XLogWrite with smaller wal_buffers. -Robert
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: