Re: parallel restore vs. windows

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andrew Dunstan
Тема Re: parallel restore vs. windows
Дата
Msg-id 49453ECC.5030006@dunslane.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: parallel restore vs. windows  (Andrew Chernow <ac@esilo.com>)
Ответы Re: parallel restore vs. windows  (ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>)
Re: parallel restore vs. windows  ("Jaime Casanova" <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>)
Список pgsql-hackers

Andrew Chernow wrote:
>
> If it previously worked without threads, than in theory a deep copy of
> the thread_arg should fix the core dump; especially if the non-windows
> fork() method works with this patch.  Maybe you can get away with only
> copying some of the members (trial-n-error), I don't think they are
> all being used in this context.  Nothing should be copied from within
> the thread itself.
>

I did this, but it turned out that the problem was a logic error that I
found once I had managed to get a working debugger. However, the Windows
thread code should now be more robust, so thanks to Andrew and Magnus
for the suggestions.

This version completes properly on Windows with the regression database.

Left to do:

. improve error checking
. memory leak cleanup
. code cleanup
. docs

I hope to have this done shortly.

cheers

andrew

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Hitoshi Harada"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Windowing Function Patch Review -> Standard Conformance
Следующее
От: Mark Mielke
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code