Re: benchmarking the query planner

>>> "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: 
>>  Which raises the issue, if we could get better statistics by
passing
>> the whole table, why not do that when VACUUM ANALYZE is run?
> 
> I think the reason is "because the next autovacuum would undo it".
The table has 32.4 million rows.
autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor is 0.1.
autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor is 0.2.
We run a nightly VACUUM ANALYZE.
Deletes are rare.
Normal operations don't update more than a few thousand rows per day.
I know that normal operations never cause an autovacuum of this table.
Perhaps if there was a way to share this information with
PostgreSQL....
-Kevin