Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements

Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> - Falling back to regular insert will take long time for update of whole 
> table - and that was one of reasons of that patch. Users forget to drop 
> GIN index before a global update and query runs forever.

If *that* is a use case we're interested in, the incoming tuples could 
be accumulated in backend-private memory, and inserted into the index at 
commit. That would be a lot simpler, with no need to worry about 
concurrent inserts or vacuums.

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com