Re: A bug with ALTER TABLE SET WITHOUT OIDS in CVS HEAD

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От KaiGai Kohei
Тема Re: A bug with ALTER TABLE SET WITHOUT OIDS in CVS HEAD
Дата
Msg-id 492E24A3.7000806@ak.jp.nec.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на A bug with ALTER TABLE SET WITHOUT OIDS in CVS HEAD  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
Ответы Re: A bug with ALTER TABLE SET WITHOUT OIDS in CVS HEAD  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> This patch:
> 
>> commit 35ad25ad66fa3999bbc0bb59ca13cef3d750fb07
>> Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
>> Date:   Sat Jul 26 19:15:35 2008 +0000
>>
>>     As noted by Andrew Gierth, there's really no need any more to force a junk
>>     filter to be used when INSERT or SELECT INTO has a plan that returns raw
>>     disk tuples.  The virtual-tuple-slot optimizations that were put in place
>>     awhile ago mean that ExecInsert has to do ExecMaterializeSlot, and that
>>     already copies the tuple if it's raw (and does so more efficiently than
>>     a junk filter, too).  So get rid of that logic.  This in turn means that
>>     we can throw away ExecMayReturnRawTuples, which wasn't used for any other
>>     purpose, and was always a kluge anyway.
>>         In passing, move a couple of SELECT-INTO-specific fields out of EState
>>     and into the private state of the SELECT INTO DestReceiver, as was foreseen
>>     in an old comment there.  Also make intorel_receive use ExecMaterializeSlot
>>     not ExecCopySlotTuple, for consistency with ExecInsert and to possibly save
>>     a tuple copy step in some cases.
>>
> 
> made this test case crash:
> 
> CREATE TABLE xtable (padding char(2000)) WITH OIDS;
> INSERT INTO xtable  VALUES('1');
> ALTER TABLE xtable SET WITHOUT OIDS;
> INSERT INTO xtable (SELECT * FROM xtable);
> 
> with assertion failure:
> 
> TRAP: FailedAssertion("!(!(tup->t_data->t_infomask & 0x0008))", File: 
> "heapam.c", Line: 1782)

http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_8.4_Open_Items

In addition, it can show us another unexpected behavior.

* Before patch applied: postgres=# CREATE TABLE t1 (a int, b text) WITH OIDS; CREATE TABLE postgres=# INSERT INTO t1
VALUES(1,'aaa'), (2,'bbb'), (3,'ccc'); INSERT 0 3 postgres=# SELECT oid,* FROM t1;   oid  | a |  b -------+---+-----
16405| 1 | aaa  16406 | 2 | bbb  16407 | 3 | ccc (3 rows)
 
 postgres=# INSERT INTO t1 (SELECT * FROM t1); INSERT 0 3 postgres=# SELECT oid,* FROM t1;   oid  | a |  b
-------+---+----- 16405 | 1 | aaa  16406 | 2 | bbb  16407 | 3 | ccc  16405 | 1 | aaa  16406 | 2 | bbb  16407 | 3 | ccc
(6rows)
 

The newly insered three tuples preserves its object identifier because
the fetched tuples has its valid object identifier which means it does
not need to assign a new one.

The matter comes from that we cannot guess ahead whether the fetched
tuple has object identifier field, or not. Thus, it is necessary to
enforce to translate fetched tuples into the current proper rowtype
on INSERT, UPDATE or SELECT INTO.

If my understanding is correct, the following patch can fix the matters.

---------------------(cut here)---------------------

*** src/backend/executor/execScan.c    (revision 1244)
--- src/backend/executor/execScan.c    (working copy)
***************
*** 243,250 ****      * If the plan context requires a particular hasoid setting, then that has      * to match, too.
  */
 
!     if (ExecContextForcesOids(ps, &hasoid) &&
!         hasoid != tupdesc->tdhasoid)         return false;
     return true;
--- 243,249 ----      * If the plan context requires a particular hasoid setting, then that has      * to match, too.
  */
 
!     if (ExecContextForcesOids(ps, &hasoid))         return false;
     return true;
---------------------(cut here)---------------------

* After the patch applied:
 postgres=# CREATE TABLE t1 (a int, b text) WITH OIDS; CREATE TABLE postgres=# INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (1,'aaa'),
(2,'bbb'),(3,'ccc'); INSERT 0 3 postgres=# SELECT oid,* FROM t1;   oid  | a |  b -------+---+-----  16435 | 1 | aaa
16436| 2 | bbb  16437 | 3 | ccc (3 rows)
 
 postgres=# ALTER TABLE t1 SET WITHOUT OIDS; ALTER TABLE postgres=# INSERT INTO t1 (SELECT * FROM t1); INSERT 0 3
postgres=#SELECT * FROM t1;  a |  b ---+-----  1 | aaa  2 | bbb  3 | ccc  1 | aaa  2 | bbb  3 | ccc (6 rows)
 

* After patch applied: postgres=# CREATE TABLE t1 (a int, b text) WITH OIDS; CREATE TABLE postgres=# INSERT INTO t1
VALUES(1,'aaa'), (2,'bbb'), (3,'ccc'); INSERT 0 3 postgres=# SELECT oid,* FROM t1;   oid  | a |  b -------+---+-----
16420| 1 | aaa  16421 | 2 | bbb  16422 | 3 | ccc (3 rows)
 
 postgres=# INSERT INTO t1 (SELECT * FROM t1); INSERT 0 3 postgres=# SELECT oid,* FROM t1;   oid  | a |  b
-------+---+----- 16420 | 1 | aaa  16421 | 2 | bbb  16422 | 3 | ccc  16423 | 1 | aaa  16424 | 2 | bbb  16425 | 3 | ccc
(6rows)
 

Thanks,
-- 
OSS Platform Development Division, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Robert Haas"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Enable pl/python to return records based on multiple OUT params
Следующее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Thread safety