Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>>> Ron Mayer wrote:
>>>>> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 08:18 -0800, Ron Mayer wrote:
>>>>>>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>>>>>>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>>>>>>>> ... harder to keep
>>>>>>>>> up with the list traffic; so something is happening that a simple
>>>>>>>>> volume count doesn't capture.
>>>>>>> If measured in "bytes of the gzipped mbox" it ...
>>>>>> Its because we eliminated the -patches mailing list.
>>>>> That's part of it. I've added -patches to the graph at
>>>>> http://0ape.com/postgres_mailinglist_size/ as well as
>>>>> a graph of hackers+patches combined; and it still looks
>>>>> like hackers+patches is quite high in the past 3 months.
>>>>>
>>>>> With hackers+patches it looks like 2002-08 was the biggest
>>>>> month; but the past 3 months still look roughly twice
>>>>> late 2007's numbers.
>>>> Can someoone graph CVS traffic, showing the historical number of commits
>>>> and number of changed lines?
>>> Ohloh has some graphs, are they detailed enough?
>>> http://www.ohloh.net/projects/postgres/analyses/latest
>> I saw that but that only shows total lines, not the number of lines
>> changed, or commits per hour, etc.
>
> I've got a database of all our commits with info like: timestamp,
> author, number of rows added/deleted, number of files modified, which
> files modified, rows modified in each file. Basically it's data quickly
> parsed from a "git log --stat" of HEAD (because it was a whole lot
> easier to parse the git stuff). It's got about 27,500 commits in it -
> only the stuff that happened on HEAD, nothing for backbranches.
>
> So, if you can be a bit more specific in what you want :) Attached is
> for example "commits per month" and "lines per month".
Here's another one that crudely shows the amount of code vs docs commits
(just looking at docs/* vs src/* - clearly very crude)
Sent as a separate mail since -general won't accept large mails.
//Magnus
