Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tomas Vondra
Тема Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
Дата
Msg-id 49271E95.5080200@fuzzy.cz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds  ("Andrus" <kobruleht2@hot.ee>)
Список pgsql-performance
> Thank you.
> My 8.1.4 postgresql.conf does not contain such option. So
> vacuum_cost_delay is off probably.
> Since doc does not recommend any value, I planned to use 2000
>
> Will value of 30 allow other clients to work when VACUUM FULL is running ?

No, as someone already noted the VACUUM FULL is blocking anyway (and
does not use this value at all).

> Uncommented relevant values in postgresql.conf file are:
>
> shared_buffers = 15000
> work_mem = 512

I'd consider increasing this value a little - 0.5 MB seems too low to me
(but not necessarily).

> maintenance_work_mem = 131072
> fsync = on
> effective_cache_size= 70000

Well, your server has 2GB of RAM and usually it's recommended to set
this value to about 60-70% of your RAM, so using 540MB (25%) seems quite
low. Anyway this is just a hint to PostgreSQL, it does not increase
memory consumption or so - it's just an estimate of how much data are
cached by kernel.

Anyway, I don't expect these values have significant effect in case of
the issue solved in this thread.

regards
Tomas

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
Следующее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds