Re: gram.y=>preproc.y

David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Nov 10, 2008, at 11:17 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>> David, how is your awk-fu? If it's any good then I'm happy to leave 
>> it to you. Otherwise I will try to make a few hours somewhere to 
>> un-uglify this.
>
> My Perl is excellent, but my awk is remedial. What part does awk play?
>
>

I know about your perl ;-)

The original is in awk. It's the a2p translation to Perl that's horrid.

It's OK - I'll do it before long.

cheers

andrew