Re: AW: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN

"Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes:
> My trial implementation using physical/logical attribute numbers
> isn't so clean as I expected. I'm inclined to restrict my change to
> fix the TODO
> * ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN to inherited table put column in wrong place
> though it would also introduce a backward compatibility.

I'm confused --- how will that make things any simpler or cleaner?
You still need physical/logical column numbering distinction in order
to fix inherited ADD COLUMN, don't you?
        regards, tom lane