Re: Multi tenancy : schema vs databases

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От John R Pierce
Тема Re: Multi tenancy : schema vs databases
Дата
Msg-id 48b4f158-a975-0f7c-60c5-8cf0538b2ea3@hogranch.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Multi tenancy : schema vs databases  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On 10/1/2016 11:39 AM, Jeff Janes wrote:
>
> As others have said, different databases makes connection pooling less
> efficient, which could be very important to you, or could be irrelevant.

1000 apps running at once each with their own DB and 10s of connections
== 10s of 1000s of database connections, which means 10s of 1000s of
database processes.

1000 apps only connecting as needed for each transaction == database
server forks for every connection, expensive.





--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz



В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Rakesh Kumar
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Multi tenancy : schema vs databases
Следующее
От: John R Pierce
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Multi tenancy : schema vs databases