Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 11:36:19AM +0900, KaiGai Kohei wrote:
>> Yes, unfortunatelly.
>> No one replied to my proposed design:
>> http://marc.info/?l=pgsql-hackers&m=122222470930544&w=2
>
> FWIW, I didn't know what to say about that proposal because I still
> don't know what problems any of this is trying to solve. Perhaps I'm
> just obtuse (and people should feel free to ignore me, since I'm not
> volunteering any code anyway); but this entire discussion seems to me
> to lack clear statements of what the goals of the effort are.
I previously summarized this here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-09/msg01067.php
Your list is quite similar, so at least our understandings seem to
converge. :-)