Tom Lane wrote:
> So ... I couldn't help noticing that the consensus among the Perl guys
> seemed to be that "90% of what is on CPAN is unmaintained crap".
> (They agree however that the other 10% is what makes it worth doing; and
> furthermore that you can't easily tell which fraction any new project
> will fall into.)
>
> Maybe pgfoundry isn't doing so bad after all. Just sayin'.
Yeah I would agree with that. I find that only "real" issue with
PgFoundry is the PgFoundry (aka Gforge) not the quality of the projects
being hosted.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> regards, tom lane
>