Re: A small note about the difficulty of managing subprojects

Tom Lane wrote:

> So ... I couldn't help noticing that the consensus among the Perl guys
> seemed to be that "90% of what is on CPAN is unmaintained crap".
> (They agree however that the other 10% is what makes it worth doing; and
> furthermore that you can't easily tell which fraction any new project
> will fall into.)
> 
> Maybe pgfoundry isn't doing so bad after all.  Just sayin'.

Yeah I would agree with that. I find that only "real" issue with 
PgFoundry is the PgFoundry (aka Gforge) not the quality of the projects 
being hosted.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

> 
>             regards, tom lane
>