Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 18:28 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
>>
>>> Version 7
>>>
>> After reading this for awhile, I realized that there is a rather
>> fundamental problem with it: it switches into "consistent recovery"
>> mode as soon as it's read WAL beyond ControlFile->minRecoveryPoint.
>>
>
> Just seen this patch has been bounced into November CommitFest, even
> though the new patch fixes all of the concerns raised.
>
> I'm concerned that this is going to make the final Hot Standby patch
> fairly large, which will make it even harder to review, test and
> generally get accepted.
>
> What's the best way to make this easier for you/others to review?
>
>
The fact that it's been put on the November list doesn't mean it can't
be reviewed and committed before then.
cheers
andrew