Re: FSM rewrite committed, loose ends

Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Question for the slow readers: this new FSM scheme being dynamic, it's no 
> longer possible to have table bloat, right?
> (where table bloat is full of dead-for-any-transaction tuples, and you have to 
> CLUSTER or VACUUM FULL to be able to reuse the space it takes)

No, it didn't change that. Regular VACUUMing or autovacuum is still needed.

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com