Re: Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches (for CommitFest:Sep)
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches (for CommitFest:Sep) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 48DA74E5.4050902@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches (for CommitFest:Sep) (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Peter, I am confused how the above statement relates to a posting you > made a week ago: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-09/msg01067.php > > Now these items are arguably useful and welcome features in their own > right. Unfortunately, this patch has chosen to provide these features in > a way that makes them accessible to the least amount of users. And > moreover, it bunches them all in one feature, while they should really > be available independently. I just want to distinguish the causalities in the various arguments that are being made. There are many ways to approach this, two of which could be: We want MAC => SELinux is the only proven way to implement MAC => let's take the patch or SELinux is way too complex => We don't take the patch => Figure out the MAC issue some other way
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: