Re: parallel pg_restore

Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 16:50 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> 
>> If we get all that done by November we'll have done well. And we know 
>> that in some cases just this much can lead to reductions in restore
>> time 
>> of the order of 80%.
> 
> Agreed. Go for it.
> 

Just as an FYI, by far the number one bottle neck on the multiple work 
restores I was doing was CPU. RAM and IO were never the problem.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake