Re: New FSM patch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Heikki Linnakangas
Тема Re: New FSM patch
Дата
Msg-id 48D2A49E.8050800@enterprisedb.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: New FSM patch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> I did a bit of testing and immediately got an Assert failure:
> 
> ...
> 
> The scary part of that is that it gets through the regression tests ---
> doesn't leave one with a warm feeling about how much of VACUUM gets
> exercised by regression.

Ouch..

> I take it the comment at the top of indexfsm.c about using one bit per
> page should be recast as a possible future improvement?

Yep. I also noted that the code in GetIndexFreeSpace() didn't match the 
comment above it.

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: New FSM patch
Следующее
От: Zdenek Kotala
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: FSM patch - performance test