Re: [Review] pgbench duration option
| От | Heikki Linnakangas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [Review] pgbench duration option |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 48C8EEFB.1040901@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [Review] pgbench duration option (ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [Review] pgbench duration option
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote: > Here is a revised version of the pgbench duration patch. Looking at the Win32 timer implementation, it's a bit different from the one we have in src/backend/port/win32/timer.c. The one in timer.c uses a separate thread and WaitForSingleObjectEx() to wait, while your implementation uses CreateTimerQueue() and CreateTimerQueueTimer(). Yours seems simpler, so I wonder why the timer.c is different? It's not too bad as it is in the patch, but it would be nice to put the setitimer() implementation into src/port, and use the same code in the backend as well. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: