Re: Page layout footprint

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Zdenek Kotala
Тема Re: Page layout footprint
Дата
Msg-id 48C10184.8050905@sun.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Page layout footprint  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Gregory Stark napsal(a):
> Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM> writes:
> 
>> Hmm, good question.  For example ZFS is platform independent, you can take disk
>> from SPARC machine and plug it into x86 and ZFS works perfectly. 
> 
> FWIW as far as I know *all* filesystems are platform independent. (Of course
> now someone is surely going to find some counter-example) Doesn't really
> change the argument though.

Yeah, of course. I selected bad word. ZFS write data structures in native endian 
format. It does not need convert data to correct byte order. Only if you switch 
harddisk from SPARC to x86 you need convert bytes order. Other systems has a 
penalty for endian conversion on oposit platform or conversion is not supported. 
However, I'm not sure if ext3 filesystem which is created on x86 machine is 
readable under linux on SPARC machine? FAT32 works fine :-) everywhere.

Maybe optimized platform independence is better term.
    Zdenek


-- 
Zdenek Kotala              Sun Microsystems
Prague, Czech Republic     http://sun.com/postgresql



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Gregory Stark
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Page layout footprint
Следующее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Page layout footprint