> thomas wrote:
>> The following bug has been logged online:
>>
>> Bug reference: 4281
>> Logged by: thomas
>> Email address: me@alternize.com
>> PostgreSQL version: 8.3.3
>> Operating system: Windows 2003
>> Description: some types of errors do not log statements
>> Details:
>>
>> this isn't really a bug but rather a request for an improvement.
>>
>> i've noticed that in some cases of errornous sql statements, the statement
>> itself is logged to the pg_log, in other cases it isn't:
>>
>> logged:
>>
>> 2008-07-05 01:53:02 CEST 3528 486eade5.dc8 10.1.1.71(53082)ERROR: column
>> "xyz" does not exist at character 294
>> 2008-07-05 01:53:02 CEST 3528 486eade5.dc8 10.1.1.71(53082)STATEMENT:
>> SELECT xyz FROM test
>>
>>
>> not logged:
>>
>> 2008-07-05 02:16:15 CEST 6644 486ebab4.19f4 127.0.0.1(1616)ERROR: invalid
>> byte sequence for encoding "UTF8": 0xc474
>> 2008-07-05 02:16:15 CEST 6644 486ebab4.19f4 127.0.0.1(1616)HINT: This error
>> can also happen if the byte sequence does not match the encoding expected by
>> the server, which is controlled by "client_encoding".
>>
>>
>> it would be usefull to always see the sql statement that provoked the error.
>> especially in the case of wrong utf byte sequences it can get very difficult
>> to find the point of failure without more information.
>
> I am unclear what would cause this. Is the STATEMENT: line coming from
> log_statement? What is the query that is not showing?
>
pretty much any query that has invalid utf8 byte code in it won't be
shown in the logs. the particular problem was with an adserver tool
(openX) that tried to insert iso-encoded data with umlauts (äüö) into an
utf8 database.
for example it tried to insert the geolocation "Zürich" during a ad
request logging which failed with:
" ERROR: invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8": 0xFC"
without showing the actual query.
maybe its by design (to not insert badly encoded characters into the
utf8 encoded logs)? nevertheless to debug those faulty programm/codes,
it would help to see what query provokes the error...
> Is the STATEMENT: line coming from log_statement?
humm... don't know. pretty much standard out of the box pgsql
installation, the postresql.conf settings are defaults.
thanks
thomas