Tom Lane wrote:
> "Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@zeut.net> writes:
>
>> I think everyone agrees that partial vacuums would be useful / *A Good
>> Thing* but it's the implementation that is the issue.
>>
>
> I'm not sure how important it will really be once we have support for
> dead-space-map-driven vacuum.
Is that something we can expect any time soon? I haven't heard much
about it really happening for 8.4.