Re: BUG #4340: SECURITY: Is SSL Doing Anything?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема Re: BUG #4340: SECURITY: Is SSL Doing Anything?
Дата
Msg-id 48AC1C88.1090905@hagander.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: BUG #4340: SECURITY: Is SSL Doing Anything?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: BUG #4340: SECURITY: Is SSL Doing Anything?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: BUG #4340: SECURITY: Is SSL Doing Anything?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: BUG #4340: SECURITY: Is SSL Doing Anything?  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Список pgsql-bugs
Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> The code is there, actually, it's just #ifdef NOT_USED :-) From a *long*
>> time ago, and the commit message just says "silence compiler warnings",
>> so I've not managed to figure out why...
>
> I think the commit you're looking for is this one:
>
> 2002-09-26 00:41  momjian
>
>     * doc/src/sgml/runtime.sgml, src/backend/libpq/be-secure.c,
>     src/interfaces/libpq/fe-secure.c: Allow SSL to work withouth
>     client-side certificate infrastructure.
>
> so you'd probably need to root around in the archives from around then
> to see why this was considered a good idea.

No, that's not the one. It's the one after that one, at:

http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-secure.c.diff?r1=1.14;r2=1.15

In general, that code needs a look-over, I think. There may be more
changes required.

//Magnus

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #4340: SECURITY: Is SSL Doing Anything?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #4340: SECURITY: Is SSL Doing Anything?