Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures
| От | Andrew Dunstan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 48A8F02C.8090208@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
David Fetter wrote: > On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 09:40:19PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> "Asko Oja" <ascoja@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> Is it possible to get it into some official 8.3.x release >>> >> This is not the kind of patch we put into stable branches. >> > > Does this really count as a user-visible change, except in the sense > that they won't see things erroring out? It doesn't add new syntax, > as far as I can tell. > > So what? That is not the only criterion for backpatching. The bigger the change the more resistance there will be to backpatching it. Code stability is a major concern. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: