Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Zdenek Kotala
Тема Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Дата
Msg-id 488F6BAD.2000708@sun.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane napsal(a):

> 
> Obviously the solution should involve a new column in pg_type and
> a new type property in CREATE TYPE, but what should the representation
> be?  A full-on approach would make the type categories be real SQL
> objects with their own system catalog and reference them by OID,
> but I can't help thinking that that's overkill.
> 
> Anyway, debating that is probably material for a separate thread ...

The collation support also needs to determine which data type is text/string.
    Zdenek


-- 
Zdenek Kotala              Sun Microsystems
Prague, Czech Republic     http://sun.com/postgresql



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David E. Wheeler
Дата:
Сообщение: Type Categories for User-Defined Types
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql