Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level
| От | Zdenek Kotala |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 48734E46.7080907@sun.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Martijn van Oosterhout napsal(a):
>
> Oh I see, you're referring to the storage of the default collation for
> a database. I was jumping ahead to the per-column collation state, when
> the collation default is attached to columns, types and domains, and
> not at the database level. So there the problem does not exist.
Yeah, but you still need one source/one collation list for database, scheme,
table and column. And of course shared tables need also collation for their indexes.
> To be honest, I'd suggest storing the collation in pg_database as a
> string, rather than as an identifier. This sidesteps the problem
> entirly.
I don't think that string is good idea. You need to use same approach on all
levels by my opinion.
Zdenek
--
Zdenek Kotala Sun Microsystems
Prague, Czech Republic http://sun.com/postgresql
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: