Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Zdenek Kotala
Тема Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2
Дата
Msg-id 48726722.9000301@sun.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan napsal(a):
> 
> 
> Zdenek Kotala wrote:
>>
>>
>> 2) contrib vs. pgFoundry
>>
>> There is unresolved answer if we want to have this in contrib or not. 
>> Good to mention that citext type will be obsoleted with full collation 
>> implementation in a future. I personally prefer to keep it on 
>> pgFoundry because it is temporally workaround (by my opinion), but I 
>> can live with contrib module as well.
>>
>>
>>       
> 
> Is there a concrete plan to get to full collation support (i.e. per 
> column) in any known time frame? If not, then I think a citext module 
> would be acceptable.

Collation per database should be part of 8.4. Radek Strnad works on it as a SoC 
project. He plans to continue on this work and implement full support as his 
Master of Thesis in 2-3 years time frame.
    Zdenek


-- 
Zdenek Kotala              Sun Microsystems
Prague, Czech Republic     http://sun.com/postgresql



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Andrew Hammond"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: the un-vacuumable table
Следующее
От: "David E. Wheeler"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0