Re: WIP patch: reducing overhead for repeat de-TOASTing

Guillaume Smet wrote:

> From the discussion we had a few months ago, I don't think the no
> RECHECK trick works with CVS tip anymore.
> 
> See my post on the "Remove lossy-operator RECHECK flag?" thread:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-04/msg00847.php
> and follow-ups.
> 
> That said, perhaps it's not the only problem you have but I thought it
> was worth mentioning.

Yeah sorry, that might not have been as clear as I hoped. What I meant 
was that I removed the explicit RECHECK clause from the GiST operator 
class definition - since as you correctly mention, CVS tip throws an 
error if this is present.


ATB,

Mark.

-- 
Mark Cave-Ayland
Sirius Corporation - The Open Source Experts
http://www.siriusit.co.uk
T: +44 870 608 0063