Re: [HACKERS] Another bug in pg_operator.h

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Another bug in pg_operator.h
Дата
Msg-id 4858.909679966@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Another bug in pg_operator.h  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Another bug in pg_operator.h
Список pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Yes.  See include/catalog/template1_check.sql.  Uses SQL to do checks.

Hmm.  OK, that script has some overlap with what I did last night.
But is it run automatically?  I think putting the checks into a
regression test is a better plan.

Also, in playing around with template1_check.sql, I discovered that
pg_operator OID 644

DATA(insert OID = 644 (  "<>"       PGUID 0 b t f  30  30  16 644 649  0  0 oid8ne neqsel neqjoinsel ));

points to a nonexistent operator --- there is no oid8ne in pg_proc, nor
in the code... anyone feel like fixing it?
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Vince Vielhaber
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/include/catalog pg_operator.h'
Следующее
От: "Taral"
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items