Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>> I'm tempted to suggest letting the script invoke autoconf, too,
>> but that would require standardizing where to find the correct
>> version of autoconf for each branch; so it might not be such a
>> great idea.
>
> Unfortunately that's true. Maybe we could agree on using an alias for
> the right version of autoconf, but it seems likely to be error prone.
Or we could sidestep the issue by not running autoconf, but
search-replace the version strings in configure directly with the perl
script.
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com