Re: 1.8.4 bug DB Restriction field
| От | Guillaume Lelarge |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: 1.8.4 bug DB Restriction field |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 484945EB.3010404@lelarge.info обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: 1.8.4 bug DB Restriction field (Zach Conrad <zach.conrad@digitecinc.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: 1.8.4 bug DB Restriction field
|
| Список | pgadmin-support |
Zach Conrad a écrit :
> Thank you for your quick response.
>
> There are a few things this brings up:
>
> 1. The pgAdmin help file states the use of datname IN ('blah') in the DB Restriction field
> 2. Most people know which databases they want to connect to. Wouldn't it make
> more sense to use datename IN (...) rather than NOT IN?
>
OK, it seems my bugfix was wrong. And I suppose the one on schema
restriction is also wrong.
My patch is more user friendly (you don't have to know the name of
pg_database's columns), but it allows less stuff (you can just give
databases' names, you won't be able to filter on columns other than
datname). It seems a regression to me, sorry about this.
Dave, what do you think I should do ? remove the patch ?
Regards.
--
Guillaume. http://www.postgresqlfr.org http://dalibo.com
В списке pgadmin-support по дате отправления: