Re: Better Hardware, worst Results

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Better Hardware, worst Results
Дата
Msg-id 4847.1099604773@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Better Hardware, worst Results  (Alvaro Nunes Melo <al_nunes@atua.com.br>)
Список pgsql-performance
Alvaro Nunes Melo <al_nunes@atua.com.br> writes:
> I have a very tricky situation here. A client bought a Dell dual-machine
> to be used as Database Server, and we have a cheaper machine used in
> development. With identical databases, configuration parameters and
> running the same query, our machine is almost 3x faster.

> ==> Dell PowerEdge:
> HD: SCSI

> ==> Other machine:
> HD: IDE

I'll bet a nickel that the IDE drive is lying about write completion,
thereby gaining a significant performance boost at the cost of probable
data corruption during a power failure.  SCSI drives generally tell the
truth about this, but consumer-grade IDE gear is usually configured to
lie.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Rod Taylor
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Better Hardware, worst Results
Следующее
От: Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Restricting Postgres