Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Shouldn't we at least make it fail with EINVAL if "who" doesn't match
>>> whichever semantics this code is able to implement?
>
>> Yeah, we only ever call it asking for our own process, but I guess we
>> might at some point in the future change that, so it can't hurt.. Want
>> me to do it, or will you?
>
> Please do, I'm going to bed ...
Done.
//Magnus